Saturday, August 24, 2019

Pay Attention!


RIO DE JANEIRO - In the height of daytime on Monday, the sky suddenly blackened, and day became night in Sao Paulo. Sure, smog is bad in the Western Hemisphere's largest city, where traffic jams can stretch for dozens of miles. But not this bad. What was going on? Was the end near? "Apocalypse!" one person cried on Twitter. "The final judgment is coming!" another added.[1]

Apocalypse –no! The final judgment –no! –just another indicator of man’s stupidity. A disregard for the well-being of people in the selfish pursuit of wealth and power.

It is apparent that humans do not learn from past events. Are things any worse now than earlier times in history? It is difficult to imagine that people at the time of the flood were godless to a greater degree than many today. It is debatable that Sodom was more perverted and immoral than many societies currently. The apostle Paul writing to Timothy said, “…the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil…”[2] his statement rings true in the realm of politics. Russia claims to be a communist country, that’s a farce, it is a totalitarian dictatorship. Putin is one of the riches men, if not the richest man, on earth. The USA boasts that it is the greatest democracy, not so! It is a republic in which money rules every aspect of life, and the government. Money from Lobbyists dictates most of what goes on in government. Trump promised to drain the swamp, that’s a laugh; he’s the biggest swamp rat, in a much bigger swamp. Trudeau is as much in love with money as he is himself, if that’s even possible. The love of wealth and power derived from wealth is as much a scourge today as it ever was. Not just in politics, but in every walk of life. Living in a free country is only possible if you pay for it. Nero was a horrible leader, but was he any worse than Trump, Putin, Xi Jinping, Trudeau, or Duterte?

The Pharisees and Sadducees came, and to test Jesus they asked him to show them a sign from heaven. He answered them, "When it is evening, you say, 'It will be fair weather, for the sky is red.' And in the morning, 'It will be stormy today, for the sky is red and threatening.' You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs of the times.[3]
The religious leaders had the written Law and the Prophecies at their disposal. They were the guardians of Israel, it was their responsibility to lead Israel. Jesus rebuked them for not recognizing the signs of the times. Isaiah spoke of the coming Messiah. His birthplace was announced in advance, his ministry was stated, and his death foretold. Were Israel’s leaders anymore steeped in tradition than church leaders today? Isn’t it hypocritical to criticize Pharisees of the first century for having their own set of rules, when every church has its own set of doctrines?

Just as it was in the days of Noah, so too it will be in the days of the Son of Man. They were eating and drinking, and marrying and being given in marriage, until the day Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed all of them. Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot: they were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, but on the day that Lot left Sodom, it rained fire and sulfur from heaven and destroyed all of them--it will be like that on the day that the Son of Man is revealed.[4]
Jesus was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God was coming. He answered them, and pointed out that people facing destruction by the flood, and those in Sodom, paid no attention to warnings. They ignored any sign; they were too engaged in “normal life” to be bothered by any distraction. That would be the same situation at the time of Jesus return in his kingdom, at the end of the Jewish age. Jesus warned about the coming judgment on Israel, he gave indicators as to when it would happen, but no date or time. Much of Jesus teaching included the necessity of being ready, and being prepared. Many religious leaders should be concerned right now, because according to their misinterpretation of Jesus’ teaching concerning Jerusalem –the silly stuff about a “rapture”, or “earthly reign”, the end might be right on their doorstep. Were Jewish leaders any more blinded by their erroneous doctrines than church leaders today?

When you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near.[5]
Immediately after the suffering of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven will be shaken. Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see 'the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven' with power and great glory. And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place.[6]
Those who are ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of them the Son of Man will also be ashamed when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.And he said to them, Truly I tell you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see that the kingdom of God has come with power.[7]
It is abundantly clear that Jesus said, and meant, that within the lifetime of some of his audience he would return. Which, unless you think that God is capricious, Jesus did. The event of his return, in the time he said it would happen, shreds the various doctrines fabricated around the thousand year reign in Revelation. It’s time the religious world woke up to the fact, that you either believe what Jesus said, or you don’t. All the millennium theories are man-made and built on doubt. That is, doubt that God accomplished his purpose in Jesus. Churches have taken notions that suited them, and discarded truths, simply because they don’t fit their fancy. The Pharisees of Jesus time followed their own set of rules, the same way churches do, and have done for centuries.
So, for the sake of your tradition, you make void the word of God. You hypocrites! Isaiah prophesied rightly about you when he said: 'This people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.'[8]
Do you think that the passage quoted by Jesus from Isaiah was any more of a rebuke to the Pharisees than to churches throughout time? Present day Christian religions need to reflect upon the words of Jesus.
Then he began to reproach the cities in which most of his deeds of power had been done, because they did not repent. Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I tell you, on the day of judgment it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon than for you. And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted to heaven? No, you will be brought down to Hades. For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I tell you that on the day of judgment it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.[9]
Nothing in scripture is directed at the present time, however, all principles apply. Is it possible that with all the advantages available in the present, that churches will be held less accountable than the cities Jesus named? If the words of Jesus are not believable now, they would not have been believable if you lived when Jesus was on earth. To believe in Jesus; we have more evidence, greater knowledge, greater freedom, less opposition, and more time, than people living in the first century. Jesus provided another principle –“…to whom much has been given, much will be required...[10]

The fanatics pushing their climate change agenda, charge humanity as guilty for causing the problems, (somehow, they themselves are exempt from guilt, and free to fly in gas-emitting jets to meetings condemning humanity). For forty years or more these climate zealots have demanded money to prevent change from continuing. In case you are wondering, I do believe that change is taking place. I don’t however, agree with the self-righteous disciples of pantheistic programs. I don’t believe man causes everything going wrong with the climate today. Has humanity been irresponsible in caring for the planet? –of course. The pseudo-science of anthropogenic climate change is nothing more than a façade covering greed. Climate scientists clamber for more and more funding –they are saving the planet. Rubbish! They have not improved or prevented anything. Were the people building the Tower of Babel any more arrogant and self-centered than the people claiming they can fix the world’s climate?

“More frequent and extreme heat” “Rising seas and increased coastal flooding” “Longer and more damaging wildfire seasons” “More destructive hurricanes” “Military bases at risk” “National landmarks at risk” “Costly and growing health impacts” “An increase in extreme weather events” “Heavier precipitation and flooding” “Destruction of marine ecosystems” “More severe droughts in some areas” “Widespread forest death in the Rocky Mountains” “Increased pressure on groundwater supplies” “Growing risks to our electricity supply” “Changing seasons” “Melting ice” “Disruptions to food supplies” “Plant and animal range shifts” “The potential for abrupt climate change”
We Need Your Support
to Make Change Happen

We can reduce global warming emissions and ensure communities have the resources they need to withstand the effects of climate change—but not without you. Your generous support helps develop science-based solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.[11] DONATE! DONATE! DONATE! …………….
The only thing left out of the list is Donald Trump’s heel spurs. The article by “The Union of Concerned Scientists” is a heart breaker. We are to put our trust in the same bunch of nitwits that have failed on every count for over forty years? There is no business that would ever seek an IPO with their dismal record, yet we are told to get on board. We are in sad shape, if the future of the world depends on failed science. Please excuse my cynicism, while I don’t believe any of the charlatans promoting snake oil as a solution to the world’s woes, I do believe that many things are changing. The changes taking place though, are beyond human control. You may as well be King Knut demanding the waves to stop, as trust in human ability to reverse the changes taking place. The only thing humans can control is their response to climate change. Instead of wasting trillions of dollars on trying to stop the world changing, the money should be to good use by making preparation for a different future.

For atheists, climate change could indicate that man cannot control the future. The display of nature’s power to do its own thing, could indicate to godless people that we are all subject to powers beyond ourselves. There should be no fear for evolutionists, since the present changes suggest that evolution is about to require adaptation for survival. If there is no God, and everything that exists is a result of happenstance and mistakes, this change should be welcomed. Why if evolution is about to move to a more advanced stage, would evolutionists not embrace the changes? People have rushed to support climate scientists, governments have done the same. It makes no sense to try regulate things beyond our control, but without faith in God, the next best thing is to turn to human knowledge.
Icarus and his father attempt to escape from Crete by means of wings that his father constructed from feathers and wax. Icarus' father warns him first of complacency and then of hubris, asking that he fly neither too low nor too high, so the sea's dampness would not clog his wings nor the sun's heat melt them. Icarus ignored his father's instructions not to fly too close to the sun; when the wax in his wings melted he tumbled out of the sky and fell into the sea where he drowned.[12]
For the conceited “scientists” who believe they can control nature, the fable from Greek mythology is suitable.

Putting fancy human doctrines aside, believers need to accept the events taking place as reinforcing human life is frail and fleeting. The signs do not have to indicate the end of all things. They do suggest a message to be learned, is that life is not guaranteed. Anyone of us at any moment may step off this world into eternity. For that we must be prepared. The parables of Jesus taught that people should be ready and waiting for his return. We cannot go through life thinking that everything remains the same and will continue to be that way. That was the attitude before the flood. That was the attitude in building the Tower of Babel. That was the attitude before the temple and Jerusalem were destroyed. Look at today’s changes, and if you realize there is nothing you can do about them, and you feel insignicant, that’s a good thing. Turn your eye heavenward, and like Habakkuk be comforted, that “the LORD is in His holy temple. Let all the earth be silent before Him.[13]




[1] www.greenwichtime.com
[2] 1Ti 6:10 
[3] Mat 16:1-3
[4] Luke 17:26-30
[5] Luke 21:20 
[6] Mat 24:29-31, 34
[7] Mar 8:38, 9:1
[8] Mat 15:6-9
[9] Mat 11:20-24
[10] Luke 12:48 
[11] https://www.ucsusa.org
[12] Greek mythology
[13] Hab 2:20

Saturday, June 8, 2019

Looking for a Kingdom


Do not worry then, saying, 'What will we eat?' or 'What will we drink?' or 'What will we wear for clothing?' For the Gentiles eagerly seek all these things; for your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.[1]

Seek - If we restrict our enquiry to passages with a religious reference, we find that in these instances the term denote man's general philosophical search or quest. The root of this concept is to be found in the frequent LXX use of ζητειv for the Hebrew word. and also in the use of the term in secular literature, where it is a technical term for philosophical investigation … If the heathen are primarily concerned about food and clothes, Christians are to seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness (Mt. 6:32 f.; cf. Lk. 13:24), They are to seek those things  which are above (Col. 3:1) … In Philo the philosophical enquiry of the mind is combined in a unique way with the heart's seeking after God.[2]

First - the sense "above all" occurs … at Mt. 6:33. The meaning here cannot be that one must first seek after God's kingdom and then after other things. "Above all" is the only meaning which corresponds to the central position which orientation to the kingdom of God has in the proclamation of Jesus.[3]

First of all we have to understand that Jesus was talking to Jews. He obviously was not speaking to Christians, since that movement didn’t begin until after his death. The term Gentile to Jews was pejorative. “ἔθνος - eth'nos, a race … specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): - Gentile, heathen, nation, people.”[4] A Jewish concept of the kingdom of God includes:
Reign or sovereignty of God as contrasted with the kingdom of the worldly powers. The hope that God will be King over all the earth … The Kingdom of God, however, in order to be established on earth, requires recognition by man; that is, to use the Hasidæan phrase borrowed from Babylonia or Persia, man must ‘take upon himself the yoke of the Kingdom of God’. The yoke of God's Kingdom—the yoke of the Torah—grants freedom from other yokes. Especially was it the principle of one party of the Hasidæans, the Zealots, not to recognize as king any one except God, and the prayer Abinu Malkenu—‘Our Father, our King, we have no King except Thee!’[5]
Since scriptural references accompany relevant points, it is likely that this portrayal of the kingdom would have been close to first century concepts. Jews expected an earthly theocracy. The kingdom was distinctly Jewish being based on interpretation of prophecy and teaching of early rabbis. Jesus’ teaching in Matthew’s gospel, chapters 5, 6, 7, could be called kingdom attitudes. The teaching of Jesus was different from what is found in the Torah. Jesus was concerned about attitudes as well as behaviours. Anxiety over daily necessities was to be quelled by the transcendent pursuit of God’s kingdom, and his righteousness. Discipleship to Jesus was demanding; it wasn’t a simple pastime, it was a complete life commitment. In the three chapters in Matthew there are around thirty admonitions, each one a life altering attitude. In one of those Jesus said, “…unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.”[6] The self-righteousness paraded by the Pharisees, was not what Jesus had in mind, he was speaking of the righteousness of God. Paul wrote, concerning that righteousness, “…not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but one that comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God based on faith.[7] In another place it is written, “Abraham ‘believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness…’”[8] I don’t know how many Jews listening to Jesus would have grasped what he was teaching. However, they might have recognized the superficiality of the Pharisees’ display of pomp. They certainly noticed a difference in Jesus, “…he taught them as one having authority, and not as their scribes.[9]

In the gospels there are over two dozen references made by Jesus in which he inserted an attitude or behaviour demonstrated by people of the kingdom. There is no mention of any institutional aspect of the kingdom. The Jewish desire for an earthly kingdom ruled by God, was material. Still today numerous religious denominations are waiting for the return of Christ, and the establishment of his kingdom. According to them, that will happen at the second coming of Christ. Very clever religious people have concocted doctrines addressing the kingdom. People have gone through prophecies calculating the time of Jesus’ return. Theories abound on the kingdom and what it will be like. Some suggest that Jesus failed his mission to establish his kingdom, and instead started the Church. What does Jesus say on the matter? How about, “Truly I tell you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it.”[10] No higher education needed, no particular ability to decipher prophecy, no great intelligence, and not even special piety. What is required, is to have the attitude of children –being child-like. That in no way suggests childishness. I don’t know what specific child-like characteristics Jesus had in mind, but here are a few that one author suggests adults should maintain in order to have a better life:
Curiosity – Children are incredibly curious.
Excitement – Kids can get excited about….anything.
Faith – We tell our children that if they put their minds to it they can do and achieve anything.
Trust – Children trust their parents fully.
Wonder – Children are seemingly amazed by something new every five minutes.
Short memory – A child can go from having a face with tears streaming down their face one minute, to having an ear-to-ear grin the next.
Persistence – Kids don’t give up easily.[11]
Notice that this list does not include any of the abilities utilized by people who design doctrines and theories about the kingdom of God. It becomes obvious why Jesus said, “…unless you change and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.[12] It took, and it takes, faith and trust to accept that Jesus meant what he said…
For the Son of Man is to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay everyone for what has been done. Truly I tell you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom."[13]
If you don’t believe that Jesus returned in the lifetime of some of those who listened to him, you need to change and become like children, because the faculties you are using to relate to God are not those he wants people to use.

Jesus spoke to people about things they knew, and were familiar with. His parables were common place. Their simplicity excited the common people, “At that same hour Jesus rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said, "I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and the intelligent and have revealed them to infants…[14] In teaching people Jesus stated in parables, that seeking the kingdom was an all-consuming priority. Jesus reflected on the Jewish understanding of reward for service when saying, their food, drink, and clothing would be supplied by God. Israel’s history recorded that God’s blessing would be given those who obeyed. Moses told the people about to enter the land that Mount Gerizim represented blessings, and Mount Ebal represented curses.[15]
If you obey the commandments of the LORD your God that I am commanding you today, by loving the LORD your God, walking in his ways, and observing his commandments, decrees, and ordinances, then you shall live and become numerous, and the LORD your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to possess.[16]
Moses made the statement in a long summation of the activities of Israel during their wandering, at the time Israel was poised to enter the Promised Land. Jesus said that God’s providence would be given to those whose overall objective was to seek God’s kingdom, and his righteousness. Jesus emphasized the need for disciples to give all of their time and attention to searching for God’s kingdom. If they did that, God would supply their needs. Perhaps, and I don’t know; that may have been a move on Jesus’ part suggesting that the kingdom of Israel as they knew it was about to give way to the spiritual kingdom. The time in which Jesus and his disciples taught, was the end of times. Some of his audience would live to see a time of suffering, a time of war, and a time of destruction. The period between Jesus saying he would return, and when he did return, was a time of transition. “In speaking of "a new covenant," he has made the first one obsolete. And what is obsolete and growing old will soon disappear.”[17] The first covenant passed away with the destruction of the temple. The material kingdom of Israel ended with the destruction of Jerusalem. Through the period of transition the kingdom of Israel was waxing old, the kingdom of heaven was taking root. The return of Jesus completed the phase in of the kingdom of heaven. Unlike the first, the new covenant is spiritual, God’s presence resided in the old temple. In the kingdom of God, he resides in the temple of our hearts. “The law indeed was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.[18] The kingdom to be sought is not material, we do not live a period of transition. The kingdom of God is spiritual, his word is in our hearts. We do not wait for an appearance of Jesus. That took place when he said it would. Our task is not to build institutions, our task is to be filled with God’s love and grace. We do live in a system of reciprocity whereby God blesses those who behave according to some edict, the blessings of God are given as gifts. We live by faith in God’s grace.


[1] Mat 6:31-33
[2] Theological Dictionary of the New Testament
[3] Ibid
[4] Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries
[5] Jewish Encyclopedia
[6] Mat 5:20
[7] Php 3:9 
[8] Gal 3:6 
[9] Mat 7:29 
[10] Mar 10:15 
[11] 7 Childlike Traits We Should Recapture To Live A Happier Life, By Ayodeji Awosika
[12] Mat 18:3
[13] Mat 16:27, 28
[14] Luke 10:21 
[15] Deu 27:12, 13

[16] Deu 30:16 
[17] Heb 8:13 
[18] Joh 1:17 

Monday, May 6, 2019

Have We Missed the Point?


 Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.[1]
I understand that Jesus was speaking to his disciples way back in the first century. I also appreciate that times and circumstances have changed. However, I don’t believe that things have changed so much that followers of Jesus now, have a right to claim wealth as an associated gift of discipleship. Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.[2] The difficulty of discipleship would have been severe in the early days of Christianity. In that time traditional Judaism and the fledgling Christian community would have been in constant conflict. One reason for that conflict was that Christians were looked at as renegade Jews. Understandably, families would have been torn apart. The traditional Jewish family’s cohesiveness would have been severed, as Jesus said, “I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one's foes will be members of one's own household.[3] To the Jewish leaders and their followers, Christianity was a breakaway sect of Judaism. Jesus’ statement regarding conflicting beliefs was not a threat, it was reality. Some Christians, kept their discipleship secret to avoid angering the rulers. Nicodemus was a member of the council, and under the cover of darkness sought out Jesus. Joseph of Arimathea was a secret disciple of Jesus, for the same reason.[4] As crowds of Jews mingled in Jerusalem at the time of a feast, many quietly discussed Jesus. Some thought of him as a charlatan, others said he was a good man. One thing all agreed, was not to speak of Him openly for fear of the Jewish leaders.[5] The parents of the blind man healed by Jesus, wouldn’t answer the Pharisees, because they were afraid of what they would do to them. Following the stoning of Stephen the Jews began a mega persecution against Christians.

Following Jesus’ statement that the rich have great difficulty getting into the kingdom. Peter said to him that he and the others had left everything to follow him. Jesus told him that anyone who lost their house, or family would receive a hundred times what he left in the present age, and in the future, eternal life.[6]  In a different place Jesus taught that if you give, you will receive more.[7] These statements are not promises of wealth, they are assurance for those who serve Jesus that what they do and what they forfeit will not go unnoticed, and that God recognizes service. It is incongruous to have wealth as a blessing for every disciple. Jesus said it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.[8] The “prosperity gospel” is the antithesis of Jesus’ teaching. One time Jesus invited himself to spend time with a rich man. As a result Zacchaeus, the rich man, said he would give half of what he owned to the poor, and pay four times the amount he had defrauded anyone.[9] Jesus said, “Today salvation has come to this house For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.[10] The problem is not being rich per se, but the attachment one has to wealth. Jesus taught that people shouldn’t focus on accumulating material wealth, but rather strive for spiritual wealth. He said also that “You cannot serve God and wealth.”[11] The hucksters preaching that you can have anything you want, or, that you deserve to be rich, are not preaching the gospel of Jesus. Theirs is a mixture of pop-psychology and hype. People can get the same results from reading “Think and Grow Rich” by Napoleon Hill, or one of the scores of books written on the subject of becoming wealthy. The prosperity preachers coat their gospel with snippets of scripture to make their preaching sound authentic. You will not find support for what they promise in scripture. What’s worse, is that it is very damaging to a person’s faith, when the promise of wealth doesn’t materialize. Those preachers will claim it is the person’s own fault for not having enough faith. Misguided people are hungry for what the prosperity preachers’ offer, and because it’s presented as a God-given right, it is all the more alluring. People need to keep their religion and search for wealth separate. Tony Robbins is a huge success, he offers people a way to have the wealth they really want. The promise of wealth is big business and has nothing to do with following Jesus. A wise man long ago said;
Two things I ask of you; do not deny them to me before I die: Remove far from me falsehood and lying; give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with the food that I need, or I shall be full, and deny you, and say, "Who is the LORD?" or I shall be poor, and steal, and profane the name of my God.[12]

A fact that people sometimes miss, is that following Jesus may not be the most comfortable choice. “Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me … for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” It seems that Jesus was warning his disciples. When reading this I think of a phrase in a song –I never promised you a rose garden. Jesus indicated that following him could be costly. “He summoned the crowd with his disciples, and said to them, If anyone wishes to come after me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow me.’”[13] The wearing of a crucifix is not what he had in mind. Under Roman rule, people knew the horror of crucifixion and no amulet could ever meet its reality. Jesus encouraged people to know what they are getting into. Many preachers are so eager to gain converts they fail to warn individuals of the potential cost of discipleship. The fact that the righteous suffer was frustrating to the prophets of ancient Israel. Jeremiah complained, “…Why does the way of the guilty prosper? Why do all who are treacherous thrive?[14] It obviously seems unfair if Christians are put down and pagan religions and atheists are favoured. Looking at what Jesus told his disciples Bonhoeffer wrote;
To deny oneself is to be aware only of Christ and no more of self, to see only him who goes before and no more the road which is too hard for us. Once more, all that self denial can say is: "He leads the way, keep close to him.”[15]
The metaphors and parables Jesus used in his teaching show a very specific relationship to the first century. During the period in which Judaism waned and Christianity began to flourish, the Jews persecuted Christians. It was a difficult time for Jews and Christians; Jews anticipated that the Messiah would reestablish the physical Israel, Christians were preaching that the Messiah was none other than Jesus whom the Jews crucified. The animosity of Jews toward Christians became violent. Jesus taught, “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”[16] Paul spoke of the Christian attitude to enemies, saying that if an enemy is in need of food or drink, give what is needed. That would be the correct action of a disciple who had denied himself. Paul wrote, “Let each of you look not to your own interests, but to the interests of others.[17] That Paul said, was the attitude of Jesus. And that was the attitude disciples should have.

The eleventh chapter of Hebrews is an enigma to me. The greater part of its content talks about people of faith who received blessings and did great things. Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and a host of others, all benefited because of their faith. Then almost at the end of conversation we come across people who did not receive similar blessings;
Others were tortured, refusing to accept release, in order to obtain a better resurrection. Others suffered mocking and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were stoned to death, they were sawn in two, they were killed by the sword; they went about in skins of sheep and goats, destitute, persecuted, tormented--of whom the world was not worthy. They wandered in deserts and mountains, and in caves and holes in the ground. Yet all these, though they were commended for their faith, did not receive what was promised[18]
From God’s point of view there is no disparity, no paradox, no perplexity, or enigma, concerning any of the people in the conversation on faith. That’s comforting to me, but I have a strong inclination to belong to the first group who received blessings. Some of the faithful received wealth and abundance, others suffered inhumanely. In God’s eyes they were all people of faith, and people in his care. One attitude all people of faith shared was that they put God first and foremost in their lives. Which is of course what we all need to do.

As a young person the concept of Christendom seemed right to me; there were Christians and there were pagans. Concepts, intentionally or otherwise, taught in history or religious classes influenced young minds. I wonder what influence the concept of Christendom has had on Christianity. There are a number of definitions for the term Christendom. I will look at it from the view of Catholicism and Protestantism combined. The Roman Church recognized countries with dominant Catholic populations, and government policies based on Catholic precepts as Christendom. Protestants considered countries with Catholic and/or Protestant Christians as Christendom. Following a view similar to that I view Christendom as including all countries in which Christianity was favoured. No matter what the definition, Christendom no longer exists. The proliferation of Christian denominations, the acceptance of atheism, and the open-mindedness toward non-Christian religions, under secular governments has largely done away with any favouritism to Christianity. However, there still is a residue of expectation among Christians that Christianity deserves special attention. In the western world there remains the thought that governments act according to Christian principles, and laws are based on Judeo/Christian teaching. Humanists and Atheists are trying to do away with any Christian influence. We should not be surprised when a government fails to live up to Christian principles. Canada for instance is supposed to have a secular government, which I believe is best for Christians. However, the present government has violated the principles of a secularism by seeking to favour a non-Christian religion. The anti-Islamophobia law recommended by the government shows it is more interested in being seen politically correct than adhering to the rights and freedoms of Canadians. The Canadian Charter specifies no religion should be favoured, and no religion should be disadvantaged. The current prime minister ignored the constitution when saying, “The policy going forward is that every single Liberal MP will be expected to stand up for women’s rights to choose.”[19] His statement violates more than one articles of the Charter. This prime minister further violated the Charter of Rights in the proposed “Canada Summer Jobs attestation.” In my view, no belief system should be advantaged or disadvantaged by government. There will always be some demigod in power who feel his personal beliefs are superior, and therefore should be enforceable. The failures of government is not my reason for writing. My concern is more with Christians who expect the government to rule on their side of a question because it is “Christian”. The courts in Canada have thus far resisted any acceptance of Sharia law, but Islamists continue to press for its application to family issues. A secular government is not supposed to favour any religion. The USA enshrined separation of Church and State in its Constitution. Regarding favouring one religion over another, the argument has been made that their Constitution applies to various doctrines of Christianity, since at the time of writing other religions would not have been considered. Christians face resistance when wanting the government to rule against something on religious grounds. Individual Christians must act on their beliefs; expecting a secular government to support those beliefs is unwarranted. Christians must hold a government to its mandate, to not support any religious group. The government must base decisions on evidence, not on religious grounds. There is no record of any action by Jesus to gain support from a government, or even the Jewish Council. Believers are citizens of the kingdom of God. Christians must live their lives according to the teaching of Jesus. Christians have civil rights which they need to exercise. Governments must not meddle in religion. The Charter does not allow acceptance of Sharia law. The government must avoid violating the Charter of Rights by showing favouritism to Islam. So far the courts have said the Canadian Constitution covers concerns of Sharia law, and there is no reason to accept it. Christians should not look to, or expect, government to favour them above other religions. The concept of Christendom was a curse. It came from a time when Popes had more authority than kings. It primarily represented a religious body that was as much political as it was ecclesiastical. One of the main points of Christendom was its opposition to pagan religions, namely, Islam. It was a physical response to a physical threat of Islam.


Paul wrote that believers should pray for peace. History suggests that, early Christianity expanded during persecution. I believe that Christianity suffered its greatest defeat under Constantine. First he proclaimed the Edict of Milan circa 313 CE. The Edict legalized Christianity and allowed for freedom of worship throughout the Roman Empire. Later he   convened the Ecumenical Council of Nicaea to ensure Church unity -325 CE. Constantine proclaimed the teaching of Arius false, and that it could further fragment the Empire. Arius distinguished God the Father (unbegotten), who is the only true God from Son of God (only-begotten), who is Lord/Master. That caused a schism between Trinitarians and non-Trinitarians. Also at the Council of Nicaea, Constantine endorsed the church authorities replacing the biblical Passover with Easter, a popular holiday rooted in ancient springtime fertility celebrations. Constantine kept his attachment to the sun god. The Roman Church adopted aspects of the sun-cult [Mithraism]. They held services on Sunday, they knelt towards the East and moved their nativity-feast to December 25, the birthday of the sun at the winter solstice. As well the bishops of the Roman Church were given the responsibility of electing bishops in all other congregations. Constantine envisioned a universal body of Christians –the Catholic Church. There is some debate as to which institution benefitted most from the alliance of the Empire and Christianity. In my mind it was the Empire. It was the founding of institutional Christianity, and the insertion of a hierarchical system between the individual and his/her God. It authorized the Roman Church’s persecution of Christians who wouldn’t accept its authority or doctrine. And sadly set the standard for Churches that would come later in history. Under Constantine Christian basilicas were built for worship. Constantine imposed his plan on an all too willing group of bishops, heralding the end to the fluid nature of Christianity. From that time to this, Constantine’s order of Christian practice has been accepted without question.

The teaching of Jesus is timeless. The rites and injunctions of the New Testament Scriptures, were to be observed by those to whom they were given. It is wrong to think that Judaism, or the adherence to the Law, stopped at the death of Jesus, or even on Pentecost. Early in his teaching, Jesus said that he hadn’t come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it. He went on to say that until heaven and earth passed away, not one letter, not one stroke, would pass from the law until all was accomplished.[20] The law was in force up to the destruction of the temple. Running parallel to the covenant of law, was the proclamation of grace. The covenant given to Israel, and the covenant given to all people were concurrent systems up to the temple and Jerusalem destruction. Peter spoke to Jews in the temple court, accusing them of rejecting Jesus and condemning him to death. He told them to repent, and turn to God for forgiveness. Referencing prophetic promises, Peter told the people, that times of refreshing would come from the Lord. “…and that he may send the Messiah appointed for you, that is, Jesus, who must remain in heaven until the time of universal restoration that God announced long ago through his holy prophets.[21] Peter continued exhorting them, saying that they were the descendants of the prophets and of the covenant that God gave to their ancestors.[22] He said, that all the prophets spoke of those days. He told them that they were the recipients of grace. Peter spoke about things the Jews knew, and events they expected. Most Jews at that time thought in terms of a material restoration of Israel. A few people however, held a spiritual view of God’s promises. Simeon, in a revelation was told he wouldn’t die until he’d seen the Messiah. He anticipated the consolation of Israel. He took the baby Jesus into his arms and praised God. He saw in Jesus the salvation of Israel. Also in the temple area there was a prophetess, Anna, who began to praise God and to speak about the child to all who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem.[23] And there was Joseph of Arimathea a member of the council “…who was also himself waiting expectantly for the kingdom of God.”[24]

In the west, most children sitting in Sunday school memorizing the statement, “Blessed are those who have been persecuted,” would never have imagined that persecution might actually occur. From the security of our homes we look at reports of people in China who are persecuted for being Christian. But, China is Far away. The primary audience of teaching of Jesus was those to whom he was speaking –the people at that time. The teaching of Jesus was very specific to the Jews. He referenced the Law of Moses, and current events. He mentions the Jewish council. He gave instructions related to their law. He spoke about religious practices of the Jews. That being said, the principles taught by Jesus apply to all people in every age. Christians living in the western world will not be persecuted to the same extent as people in China or those in other parts of the world. Even so, we need to keep in mind that Jesus never suggested that discipleship would ever be easy. Paul urged Christians to pray for kings, and all who in high positions, so that they would be able to live quiet and peaceable lives in godliness and dignity.[25] His injunction would apply to Jewish leaders and Roman governors. The Emperor around that time would have been Nero. If the government’s disdain for Christianity makes Christians uncomfortable, we can exercise our votes to change what we can. But really, other than voting, Christians must remember that Jesus warned his disciples, “If the world hates you, be aware that it hated me before it hated you.[26]



[1] Mat 5:10-12
[2] Mat 10:34 
[3] Mat 10:35, 36
[4] Joh 19:38
[5] Jon 7:13
[6] Mar 10:28-30
[7] Luke 6:38 
[8] Mat 10:25-26
[9] Luke 19:7
[10] Luke 19:9, 10 
[11] Mat 6:19-24
[12] Pro 30:7-9
[13] Mar 8:34 
[14] Jer 12:1 
[15] Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship
[16] Mat 5:44
[17] Php 2:4-8 
[18] Heb 11:35-39
[19] Lee Berthiaume, Ottawa Citizen, Updated: June 18, 2014
[20] Mat 5:17-19
[21] Act 3:19-21
[22] Act 3:25
[23] Luke 2:25-38
[24] Mar 15:43
[25] 1Ti 2:1, 2
[26] Joh 15:18

Is What we Believe Tradition or God's Word?

  A sampling of comments and thoughts to think about when considering what we believe: A lie told often enough becomes the truth.” “In tod...