Saturday, August 13, 2016

Hope in Jesus

The myth of America as a Christian nation, with the church as its guardian, has been, and continues to be, damaging both to the church and to the advancement of God's kingdom. Among other things, this nationalistic myth blinds us to the way in which our most basic and most cherished cultural assumptions are diametrically opposed to the kingdom way of life taught by Jesus and his disciples. … The myth clouds our vision of God's distinctly beautiful kingdom and thereby undermines our motivation to live as set-apart (holy) disciples of this kingdom.[1]

Many western countries in their beginning established laws based on Judaic, Christian principles. Except for Islamic and eastern countries, few mix religion with politics as much as the US. It appears to makes no difference to staunch Bible believing Republicans that Jesus taught that, his kingdom was not of this world[2], nor, that Jesus spoke against living by the sword.[3] There is no faction similar to the American “religious right” in the Canadian government.
Justin Trudeau’s intent to whip any vote on abortion (excepting current anti-choice MPs) has led to concern about a leader overriding an MP’s autonomy on a conscience issue… Actually, we’d be much better talking about the larger problem: whether the Westminster convention of conscience votes is itself outdated.
The labelling of certain topics as conscience issues, where free votes are allowed, stemmed in part from a narrow interpretation of morals—religious, cultural or societal. Party discipline was not appropriate because the values underlying one’s feelings were sacrosanct . . .
So is the concept of conscience votes at all relevant now? With a much broader understanding of values and morals, and in a multi- and, indeed, non-faith environment, is it appropriate to consider an MP’s feelings on these issues inviolable?[4]
This quote by Lauren Dobson is from an article in MacLean’s, by Aaron Wherry. Dobson reflects the growing attitudes of government, suggesting that the Westminster convention is outdated, because now there is “a much broader understanding of values and morals, and in a multi- and, indeed, non-faith environment…” The Canadian parliament is influenced greatly by the vocal minority, which makes good political sense. Because the “silent majority” is muted, its views are not considered. “Often, and especially in Canada, there is a consensus that religion is a private matter. … Canadians are extraordinarily cynical of professions of religious faith, especially Christian religious faith and political leaders…”[5] There is growing intolerance toward the Christian faith and the institutional Church bears much of the blame for that. From Dobson’s statement it is evident that standards which have been accepted for years as democratic, are under fire from those with divergent views and causes. But what if anything does this have to do with hope in Jesus?

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, states:
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
Religious people, specifically Christians, cannot expect that their rights of freedom, guaranteed by the Charter, will be honoured by the government. The current prime minister has said that, the right of women supersede the Charter. The government is not now, nor ever was a security blanket for people of faith. Pierre Trudeau, when acting as Justice Minister, said, “There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation,”[6] and added “what's done in private between adults doesn't concern the Criminal Code.”[7] The comments were made in support of his proposal to decriminalize homo-sexuality. During his time divorce was legalized. At that time religious institutions were horrified by the proposed changes. Governments cannot be directed exclusively by Christian principles, and nor should they; their task is to govern the country. This is the reality that Christians must get used to it. No nation or country represents God, and no earthly empire is the kingdom of God. In the same way, no Church or religious institution represents the kingdom of God. The Catholic Church is not the kingdom of God; some Catholics may be citizens of the kingdom. No Protestant Church is the kingdom of God; though some from within that community may be citizens. No evangelical or fundamental Church is the kingdom of God, but some adherents may be in it. Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world.”

The Church has brought on itself criticism from society and some of it is justified. There are as many crazy people in Church as in general society, maybe more, who knows? There are some Church activities of which “outsiders” are suspicious. I am a believer, but I am embarrassed by the antics of some “Christians”. People sometimes say that Churches are filled with hypocrites, and sometimes what they is true. Disciples of Jesus obviously benefit under a government sympathetic to their beliefs, but if faith can flourish only in that environment, it is not what it should be. Christianity blossomed under persecution, not that believers today should seek adversity. The absolute worst thing for Christianity was its acceptance as the state religion of Rome. That was the birth of the Church and institutional Christianity. Long before that, believers were instructed to pray “for kings and all who are in high positions, so that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and dignity.”[8] That did not suggest believers were to look to earthly governments for security of faith. The believer’s hope and assurance are in Jesus. If the government doesn’t hassle believers, that’s a plus, but not a necessity. People committed to a Church are going to see their world changed. People espousing causes as a means of acceptance by God, will be disillusioned. Although scoffed at by doubters and atheists, “blind faith” is the only path to God. People who believe and are committed to Jesus are to grow in faith to become like the faithful of old, “…strangers and exiles on the earth … seeking a country of their own.”[9]

Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you know me, you will know my Father also…"[10]



[1] The Myth of a Christian Nation, by Gregory Boyd,  pp. 13, 14
[2] Joh 18:36
[3] Joh 18:11
[4] macleans.ca A few more thoughts on Trudeau, abortion and the party whip, by Aaron Wherry
[5] The Private Faith and Public Lives of Evangelical MPs, Jonathan Malloy
[6] CBC Digital Archives
[7] ibid
[8] 1Ti 2:2 
[9] Heb 11:13, 14 
[10] Joh 14:6, 7 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Is What we Believe Tradition or God's Word?

  A sampling of comments and thoughts to think about when considering what we believe: A lie told often enough becomes the truth.” “In tod...