Saturday, April 9, 2016

Love as service






Love is patient
love is kind and is not jealous
love does not brag and is not arrogant
does not act unbecomingly
it does not seek its own
is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong
but rejoices with the truth
does not rejoice in unrighteousness
bears all things
believes all things
hopes all things
endures all things
Love never fails





(1Co 13:4-8)


The impact of the quotation obscures the shortfall of its application. It is considerably easier to be moved by the music of the quotation than to put the sentiments into practice. We can easily become enamoured with the author’s flawless elucidation and be wooed by sentiments of love, yet not stirred to loving action. It is like listening to a passionate aria in Puccini’s La Boheme, the music evokes emotions of beauty and love, while the lyrics portray scenes of comedy. There is nothing wrong with enjoying beautifully expressed descriptions of anything in scripture or elsewhere, but it is the purpose of the communications that must be acted upon. This delightful description of love so often quoted during marriage ceremonies had a loftier intent than simply stirring emotions. It is set as an interlude in Paul’s instruction to Christians in conflict. Believers in Corinth had divided loyalties, they were striving for power, ignoring one another’s needs, and boasting about gifts given them by God. The Corinthian assemblies were not following Christ-like principles; the name of Christ was being defamed. The shorter quotation on love was never intended to be taken out of its context. The entire discourse on love was the centerpiece to the instructions given on spiritual decorum. Concluding the first phase, the discourse on love segued to the second phase of instructions. It presented a perfect alternative to the bad behaviour of the Corinthians.

Paul’s description of love expresses God’s nature as John wrote,

We have come to know and have believed the love which God has for us. God is love, and the one who abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.”[1] Paul’s attention to the defining character of love was not for poetic reasons, but as he wrote, “…earnestly desire the greater gifts. And I show you a still more excellent way.[2]

The “excellent way” is life motivated and governed by love. The first portion of Paul’s homily on love described the emptiness and futility of religion and life without love.

If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.[3]

Paul began by pointing out that anything believers did or held as objects of religious pride were worthless without love. The exercise of spiritual gifts, speaking in tongues of ecstasy, prophesying, expansive knowledge, or extreme acts of sacrifice, were worthless before God unless they were, motivated by, and demonstrated, love.

The last phrase in the description of love is, “Love never fails.” Moving on Paul states the durability of love as opposed to the temporary nature of supernatural gifts.
Love never fails; but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part; but when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away.[4]

The arguments among Corinthian believers centered on spiritual gifts. Paul addressed the schisms fragmenting their fellowship, pointing out the need for unity, and on the subject of love he spoke of the continuing requirement for love in God’s kingdom verses the temporary period in which the spiritual gifts would be available.

When I was a child, I used to speak like a child, think like a child, reason like a child; when I became a man, I did away with childish things. For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know fully just as I also have been fully known. But now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but the greatest of these is love.[5]

Supporting the foregoing discussion Paul emphasised the need for the Corinthians to recognize the period in which they lived, a very special time, the development of kingdom life under the shadow of Judaism. In that time were special gifts that would not continue after the end of Judaism. They were still under a religious shadow, but would soon be free from its obscurity. The Corinthians were mistakenly hanging on to elements of religion that were temporary, they weren’t focused on the vital components of life in Christ.

But now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but the greatest of these is love.

It wasn’t that believers should disregard the gifts of God; under no circumstance, gifts were valuable assets in teaching about the kingdom. The prime characteristic of all believers had to be love. God’s love brought his Son into the world, Jesus’ love sent him to the grave as a sacrifice, and the believers’ love was to speak to the world of God’s grace.

We give thanks to God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, praying always for you, since we heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and the love which you have for all the saints; because of the hope laid up for you in heaven, of which you previously heard in the word of truth, the gospel which has come to you, just as in all the world also it is constantly bearing fruit and increasing, even as it has been doing in you also since the day you heard of it and understood the grace of God in truth…[6]

The Corinthian believers were instructed to recognize the temporary nature of spiritual gifts. Pursuing gifts for the purpose of being better than others was wrong, it sent a message antithetical to Christ’s teaching and nature. There is a warning to all who would be religious; do not live in the shadow seeking personal gratification, any religious activity that is not based on love, demonstrate love, or lead to love is temporal.

For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.[7]

In this brief sentence life in Christ is defined, God loved, believe in Jesus, and hope of life. Or, as Paul wrote, “now faith, hope, love, abide… not the temporary gifts over which the believers in Corinth were fighting. Not personal glory, not pride, and not ritualistic religion. Life in Christ is, loving people, faith in Jesus, and hope of life.




Jesus teaches on “what really matters.”

In everything do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets.[8]

It would have been a shocking revelation to any Jew at that time to hear Jesus suggest that the Law could be summed up in one’s treatment of other people. The fact however, was that those listening to Jesus acknowledged his teaching as impressive, “the crowds were astounded at his teaching, for he taught them as one having authority, and not as their scribes.”[9] At a later date, responding to the question, “which commandment in the law is the greatest?” Jesus answered;

"'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."[10]  

The sentence commanding love for God is found in Deut 6:5 and forms the first part of the Jewish Shema, “the oldest fixed daily prayer in Judaism, recited morning and night since ancient times.”[11] The injunction to love your neighbour as yourself is located in Lev 19:18. Interestingly neither of the two primary laws were included in the Ten Commandments. In his teaching Jesus endeavoured to illuminate aspects of the law and prophets that through legalistic and ritualistic interpretation had lost. That, true religion was based on love for God and others astounded his audience. Up to that point they had never heard the scripture explained in that way. Service to God was through loving action, not only ritualistic compliance.

Thus you will know them by their fruits. Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many deeds of power in your name?' Then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; go away from me, you evildoers.'[12]

By itself out of context this section bemoans hopelessness. Looking at the religious success of the people Jesus rejected, leaves very little reason for us to have any hope. The attributes of the “many” were not trifling; they prophesied in Jesus name, cast out demons in Jesus name, and did many miraculous things in Jesus name. To the “many” Jesus said, “go away, I don’t know you!” If Jesus didn’t recognize eminently religious people, what hope do ordinary people have? We need to back up a little and notice how Jesus began his statement, “Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.” The fault cannot be with what the “many” did in Jesus name. There is nothing inherently wrong in any of the religious activities done by the “many”. The most probable reason for rejection was not what they had done, but the motivation behind their doing things. A contrast is made between doing the will of God and their performance of otherwise legitimate activities. The will of God was summed up as, “In everything do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets.”

If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.[13]

Jesus did not condemn prophesying in his name, or, casting out demons in his name, or, performing miracles in his name. He condemned doing those things without love, or, doing them for selfish purposes.

"When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, and he will put the sheep at his right hand and the goats at the left. Then the king will say to those at his right hand, 'Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.' Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?' And the king will answer them, 'Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.' Then he will say to those at his left hand, 'You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.' Then they also will answer, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?' Then he will answer them, 'Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.' And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."[14]

The teaching of Jesus focused on the kingdom of God. His purpose in coming to earth was to open a way for people to enter that kingdom. Through his death he set in motion events that would reconcile believers to God. The scene above picturing the separation of righteous from unrighteous was to accommodate all those who lived before his death. That was the “the great and glorious day of the Lord”[15] prophesied by Joel, and referenced by Peter. The judgment spoken of in the parables of Jesus was that at the end of the Jewish age. That judgment was necessary because the sins of Israel were rolled forward year after year, only to be forgiven via the sacrifice of Jesus. Judgment doesn’t apply to those in Christ after his death; believers are in the kingdom of God,

“Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears my word, and believes Him who sent me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.”[16]

The kingdom of God was restored on earth in Jesus’ return. The judgment on Jerusalem and destruction of the temple announced the completion of God’s restoration of the kingdom of heaven on earth. The judgment of the righteous and unrighteous emphasised love and compassion toward others as the basis for acceptance. Running through the law and prophets is the same spirit of love.

The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt; I am the LORD your God.[17]

With what shall I come to the LORD and bow myself before the God on high? Shall I come to Him with burnt offerings, with yearling calves? Does the LORD take delight in thousands of rams, in ten thousand rivers of oil? Shall I present my firstborn for my rebellious acts, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul? He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God?[18]

Believers soon after the death of Jesus were instructed to demonstrate love in their lives.

Since you have in obedience to the truth purified your souls for a sincere love of the brethren, fervently love one another from the heart, for you have been born again not of seed which is perishable but imperishable, that is, through the living and enduring word of God.[19]

The end of all things is near; therefore, be of sound judgment and sober spirit for the purpose of prayer. Above all, keep fervent in your love for one another, because love covers a multitude of sins. Be hospitable to one another without complaint.[20]

By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother.[21]

We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death.[22]

It is evident from the teaching of Jesus that life in the kingdom of God exemplifies love. The religious accomplishments of people who were rejected were not themselves wrong or sinful. Miracle working is not available to believers today, that ability ended with the Jewish age. Believers today still can be absorbed in religious programs to their detriment, just like those who performed miracles yet were rejected by Jesus. It is not what they do, but their motivation that is questionable. If involvement in any good work is self-serving or for self-justification, it is not acceptable to Christ.

A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.[23]

Love among the disciples would advertise that they were disciples of Jesus. There is no better way for Jesus to be seen in any age than through the love that exists among believers. Believers reflecting God’s love and grace in their lives is better than the broken fragmented portrait of God seen in the bickering and bitterness of denominations. Divided over doctrine and separated by pride, believers fail to display God in their lives. Jesus claimed to be the light of the world, telling his disciples that they were lights in the world. Disciples were to reflect the light of God in Jesus through their own lives. That is what believers are to do today. As Jesus was the exact representation of God, believers are to represent Jesus in the way they live. That cannot be done without love.

… God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.[24]

Without God’s love mankind would be hopelessly lost. Without the expression of God’s love by disciples the world will not see God.



Growing in love

Love isn't something natural. Rather it requires discipline, concentration, patience, faith, and the overcoming of narcissism. It isn't a feeling, it is a practice.[25]

Love is not primarily a relationship to a specific person; it is an attitude, an ordination of character which determines the relatedness of the person to the whole world as a whole, not toward one object of love.[26]


Love means to commit oneself without guarantee, to give oneself completely in the hope that our love will produce love in the loved person. Love is an act of faith, and whoever is of little faith is also of little love.[27]

ἀγάπη - agape
With reference to God's love, it is God's willful direction toward man. It involves God doing what He knows is best for man and not necessarily what man desires.[28]

The love required of believers is the same love that God demonstrated in sending his own son into the world. This love is used consistently through 1Corinthians 13. A love that does not require reciprocation, but given freely.

God’s love channeling through disciples in service to others strengthens the bond between God and the believer. Sharing God’s love strengthens the giver; the more one demonstrates God’s love, the closer he or she becomes with God through Christ. I like the quote by Fromm, love “…requires discipline, concentration, patience, faith, and the overcoming of narcissism. It isn't a feeling, it is a practice.” I think it very important as Fromm said that people have to overcome self-absorption in order to let the love of God reflect through their lives. Paul I believe suggests this;

I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me.[29]

Obviously Paul had attained a level of submission and love that few of us will ever achieve, but loving is a journey. Again as Erich Fromm wrote, “Love isn't something natural.”

But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.[30]

Living and sharing love reinforces confidence in God’s love. Loving others because God loves us enables us to be secure in God’s promises, to trust God, and to acknowledge God’s faithfulness to his word and to us. Godliness might be defined as God’s love invested in Jesus flowing through our lives to people in our sphere of influence. The very nature of God reaching people through Christ’s disciples. As the world appears to get darker, God’s love will grow brighter reflected through believers.

Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? Just as it is written, "For your sake we are being put to death all day long; we were considered as sheep to be slaughtered." But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.[31]

Paul’s reality check; tribulation, distress, persecution, famine, nakedness, peril, or even death, none of these can separate us from Christ’s love. We are absolutely guaranteed victory. As he suggested there will be sacrifice, we are not promised that life on earth will always be pain or suffering free, but that’s not what Jesus died for. Jesus died so that we can enter the eternal paradise of God. Getting through this life and moving toward our goal may be perilous at times, but we’ll make it with God’s help. That is what Paul was writing about; confidence in love.

Be of the same mind toward one another; do not be haughty in mind, but associate with the lowly. Do not be wise in your own estimation. Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right in the sight of all men. If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men. Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written, "Vengeance is mine, i will repay," says the Lord. "But if your enemy is hungry, feed him, and if he is thirsty, give him a drink; for in so doing you will heap burning coals on his head." Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.[32]

The practice of love brings in peace of mind, it also removes the burden of us having to make things right. The railings of atheists and idol worshippers are silenced by love. Believers through love echo the security of knowing all is well; “…the Lord is in His holy temple. Let all the earth be silent before Him.” The practice of love permits God to handle situations over which we have no control. Through loving, enemies are thwarted, those deserving punishment will get it from God, and believers can focus on becoming more like Jesus.





[1] 1Jn 4:16 
[2] 1Co 12:31
[3] 1Co 13:1-3
[4] 1Co 13:8-10
[5] 1Co 13:11-13
[6] Col 1:3-5
[7] John 3:16
[8] Mat 7:12
[9] Mat 7:28, 29
[10] Mat 22:37-40
[11] Judaism 101
[12] Mat 7:20-23
[13] 1Co 13:1-3
[14] Mat 25:31-46
[15] Acts 2:20
[16] John 5:24
[17] Lev 19:34
[18] Mic 6:6-8
[19] 1Pe 1:22, 23
[20] 1Pe 4:7-9
[21] 1Jn 3:10
[22] 1Jn 3:14
[23] John 13:34, 35
[24] Rom 5:8
[25] The Art of Loving, by Erich Fromm
[26] Ibid
[27] Erich Fromm (1900 - 1980)
[28] The Complete WordStudy Dictionary
[29] Gal 2:20
[30] Rom 8:37-39
[31] Rom 8:35-39
[32] Rom 12:16-21

The Lord's supper?

It’s never wrong to honour Christ. Worship and honour come from the heart. How do we determine which practices are from the heart and which are ritualistic. Listening to Jesus I get the idea that our lives are our worship. Jesus was the exact representation of his Father, we are representatives of Jesus. The love that flowed through Jesus from God is to be seen in us. In that way we honour God through Christ. The Pharisees were wrapped up in their traditions.

This people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.[1]

The Lord’s supper
While they were eating, Jesus took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to the disciples, and said, "Take, eat; this is my body." Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.[2]

While they were eating, he took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to them, and said, "Take; this is my body." Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, and all of them drank from it. He said to them, "This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many. Truly I tell you, I will never again drink of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God."[3]

He said to them, "I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer; for I tell you, I will not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God." Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he said, "Take this and divide it among yourselves; for I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes." Then he took a loaf of bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, "This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me." And he did the same with the cup after supper, saying, "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.[4]

When he was at the table with them, he took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. Then their eyes were opened, and they recognized him; and he vanished from their sight.[5]

I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.[6]

The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a sharing in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a sharing in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread.[7]

Indeed, there have to be factions among you, for only so will it become clear who among you are genuine. When you come together, it is not really to eat the Lord's supper. For when the time comes to eat, each of you goes ahead with your own supper, and one goes hungry and another becomes drunk. What! Do you not have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you show contempt for the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What should I say to you? Should I commend you? In this matter I do not commend you! For I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took a loaf of bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me." In the same way he took the cup also, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me." For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes. Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be answerable for the body and blood of the Lord. Examine yourselves, and only then eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For all who eat and drink without discerning the body, eat and drink judgment against themselves. For this reason many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves, we would not be judged. But when we are judged by the Lord, we are disciplined so that we may not be condemned along with the world. So then, my brothers and sisters, when you come together to eat, wait for one another. If you are hungry, eat at home, so that when you come together, it will not be for your condemnation.[8]

Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh."[9]

They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. Awe came upon everyone, because many wonders and signs were being done by the apostles. All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts,[10]

…we sailed from Philippi after the days of Unleavened Bread, and in five days we joined them in Troas, where we stayed for seven days. On the first day of the week, when we met to break bread, Paul was holding a discussion with them; since he intended to leave the next day, he continued speaking until midnight. Then Paul went upstairs, and after he had broken bread and eaten, he continued to converse with them until dawn; then he left.[11]

The first consideration in studying the Lord’s Supper is to recognize that the customary practices in most Churches are nothing like the original supper during which Jesus instituted the memorial bread and wine. Modern day practices do not resemble Paul’s instructions to the Corinthians, he challenged them to let love govern their fellowship. Jesus offered the bread as a symbol of his body, and the wine as a symbol of his blood. Both his body and blood were given in sacrifice. A dime-sized crumb of bread and a thimble of grape juice do not constitute a meal. That we have accepted these tokens suggests that the observance is more ritualistic than symbolic.

The bread used in the Lord’s supper:
So, in conclusion, the fact of the matter is that the Bible never teaches us or even implies that the Lord’s Supper was to be taken with unleavened bread. If it were to be, it never tells us what the lack of leaven would stand for, as the only explanation ever given for its place in the Passover ritual was as an historical recollection of Israel’s hasty departure from Egypt.  The Lord’s Supper was instituted on the occasion of a Passover meal.  But it is not itself a Passover meal.  Nor is the Lord’s Supper the Last Supper.  There are many features of that particular meal that do not carry over into the Lord’s Supper of the Christian church.  It was twelve men and men only.  Nowhere are we told in the NT that women should participate.  It was taken with the participants reclining about a central table.  There were the remnants of a large meal on that table.  The Lord’s Supper is not defined by any of this.  The Lord’s Supper arose out of a Passover meal, but it is itself only what the Lord made it to be. The Lord, we are told, “took bread” and told us to take it as well: “bread” not “unleavened bread.”  And he took the fruit of the vine.  We are to do the same.  Bread and Wine are the elements of the Lord’s Supper as the Lord himself defined that Supper.[12]

In all three Gospels what Jesus gave the disciples is [in Greek] “artos,” meaning simply “bread.”  It is striking that He is not said to have given them “azumos” or “azuma” which are the proper words for unleavened bread, AND which are clearly available since they are used in each of the Gospels in the context to refer to the Passover.  In other words, the use of “artos” by Matthew, Mark and Luke to tell us what Jesus gave the disciples makes the fact that this may have been unleavened bread of NO importance.  At the same time we also must recognize that because the Scripture NOWHERE calls it “unleavened bread,” we cannot at all be sure that it was (throughout the NT “artos” is used for common or leavened bread).  We simply may not base our teaching on the silence of Scripture because then we are really basing our teaching on a human conjecture.  So, the fundamental argument, “Jesus used unleavened bread, therefore we should too,” is in fundamental error. This should close the case, but there is more.[13]

ἄρτος artos - bread (as raised) or a loaf: - (shew-) bread, loaf.

מצּה matstsâh - From H4711 in the sense of greedily devouring for sweetness; properly sweetness; concretely sweet (that is, not soured or bittered with yeast); specifically an unfermented cake or loaf, or (elliptically) the festival of Passover (because no leaven was then used): - unleavened (bread, cake), without leaven.

ἄζυμος azumos - From G1 (as a negative particle) and G2219; unleavened, that is, (figuratively) uncorrupted; (in the neuter plural) specifically (by implication) the Passover week: - unleavened (bread).

I believe the bread of the Lord’s supper was the commonly used bread for meals. Wine used in the memorial supper was common wine (fermented). I believe also that the Lord’s supper was a fellowship meal, not a ritualistic ceremony. Many scholars insist on the “love feast” being a separate meal to the Lord’s supper. I am not convinced that early Christians would have recognized any difference.

If you were to ask the ordinary Christian today what a Christian meeting was like in the days of the apostles, you would probably get different answers. An evangelical Christian would probably answer that it consisted primarily of preaching and singing. A charismatic Christian might reply that it primarily incorporated worship, praise, and the exercise of miraculous gifts. An Anglican might reply that it was principally a celebration of the Eucharist. Of course, all of those responses are partially right. However, a rather dominant part of apostolic worship that few Christians would think of today is that it centered around a meal.

That’s right—a meal! The early Christians referred to this meal as the agape. Even after the death of the apostles, the pre-Nicene Church continued to practice the agape or love feast. Yet, within a century or so after Constantine’s conversion, this important part of apostolic worship totally disappeared.

For the origin of the love feast, we need to look no further than the Last Supper. “As they were eating, Jesus took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, ‘Take, eat; this is My body’” (Matt. 26:26). So the very first Eucharist was instituted in the context of a meal! A meal continued to be the normal setting in which Christians met together for fellowship and worship. Acts 2:46 tells us: “Continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they ate their food with gladness and simplicity of heart.” The expression, “breaking bread,” no doubt includes the celebration of the Eucharist. However, the phrase, “they ate their food with gladness” would also indicate that this was more than communion; it was also a meal.

Nowhere is this practice more clearly confirmed than in the communion passage of 1 Corinthians 11:20-34. Paul begins that passage by saying, “Therefore when you come together in one place, it is not to eat the Lord’s Supper. For in eating, each one takes his own supper ahead of others; and one is hungry and another is drunk.” Now, this is obviously talking about more than just the Eucharist. Nobody gets drunk from the small amount of wine taken in communion, nor is it credible that various persons would receive communion before others because they were hungry. No, Paul is obviously describing a meal—the love feast—that preceded the actual Eucharist.[14]

In its setting the Fellowship meal was both a memorial of Jesus’ death, and an encouragement for participants. Early in its history the Church incorporated the Lord’s Supper into its list of sacraments. The how of the Eucharist became institutionalized and the when became dogma. The Church disassociated the communion from the “love feast” when assemblies moved from homes and large rooms into religious buildings. That separation has been popularized by people insisting that the Lord’s Supper is a Church function to be practiced only on Sunday. I am not persuaded that scripture warrants such an interpretation.

In the case of the Lord’s supper I believe that “necessary inference” is neither valid nor sensible in determining what is necessary.

What is necessary inference? If the assumptions or premises are a true basis this specific type of conclusion is logically inevitable or unavoidable.[15]

We sailed from Philippi after the days of Unleavened Bread, and came to them at Troas within five days; and there we stayed seven days. On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to leave the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight. … When he had gone back up and had broken the bread and eaten, he talked with them a long while until daybreak, and then left.[16]

Acts 20:7 is the go to scripture for proof that Sunday is the only day to participate in communion. That decision is based on “necessary inference”. It is false, that such a conclusion actually meets the standard test for “necessary inference”. In verse 6 the word for bread is ázumos – unleavened bread, in verse 7 the word for bread is ártos’ – bread. According to those who insist on the use of unleavened bread for the communion, the stated breaking bread on the first day of the week could not be the Lord’s supper.  Regarding “the first day of the week,” which calendar was being used? If Jewish the meeting would have been after the appearance of three stars ending the Sabbath, if Roman it would have been any time after midnight Saturday. If the latter breaking bread was after midnight that would have been Monday. We are not certain whether the group met on Saturday after dark or Sunday.

The early church shared a “potluck” meal called the “love feast” (agape), after which they would observe the Lord’s Supper (Act_2:42; 1Co_11:17-34). The “breaking of bread” in Act_20:7 refers to the Lord’s Supper, whereas in Act_20:11 it describes a regular meal. By sharing and eating with one another, the church enjoyed fellowship and also gave witness of their oneness in Christ. Slaves would actually eat at the same table with their masters, something unheard of in that day.[17]

Wiersbe provides the standard explanation of “breaking bread” as communion in verse 7, and a meal in verse 11. I have no idea how he came up with that interpretation! The Greek words for “break” in vs 7 - klaō, and “broken” in verse 11 are exactly the same. There is nothing to indicate that the assembly “broke bread” before it is mentioned in verse 11. “On the first day of the week, when we met to break bread” specifies the intention of the gathering, not what they actually did. We’re guessing that there were two “breaking breads”. And we assume they met on Sunday or maybe late Saturday. The standard for “necessary inference” is that it is “logically inevitable or unavoidable.” There is no way to logically prove that the assembly participated in the Lord’s supper some time before midnight, and then ate a meal after midnight. Conclusions like these are not unavoidable. Since there is no difference in language between vs 7 and vs 11 the Lord’s supper cannot be assumed to have taken place, nor can it be proven that it didn’t. What is obvious is that no conclusion meets the standard of “necessary inference”. There are too many unknowns and too many unfounded assumptions to substantiate any certainty.

John’s account of the mealtime is very different to the other gospels. The difference I believe indicates the true nature of the fellowship meal. John records events of that evening, how Jesus out of love for his disciples washed their feet and then issued the new commandment; “love one another.” Love was missing in the Corinthian fellowship and Paul told them that because of that, “many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.”[18] Breaking bread in fellowship was signature to Jesus, he broke the bread to feed five thousand men not counting women and children. He broke bread to feed four thousand. Jesus broke bread in the house of Cleopas and doing so revealed his identity. Breaking bread was something that Jesus did to show his love, and it was symbolic of giving his life. The Lord’s supper in its time was meant to memorialize Jesus and proclaim his death, which was the ultimate act of fellowship and love. In reality this is an unnecessary debate since the Lord’s supper was to be celebrated until Jesus returned. Which he did circa 70 CE.


Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day--things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ. Let no one keep defrauding you of your prize by delighting in self-abasement and the worship of the angels, taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, and not holding fast to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and ligaments, grows with a growth which is from God. If you have died with Christ to the elementary principles of the world, why, as if you were living in the world, do you submit yourself to decrees, such as, "Do not handle, do not taste, do not touch!" (which all refer to things destined to perish with use)--in accordance with the commandments and teachings of men? These are matters which have, to be sure, the appearance of wisdom in self-made religion and self-abasement and severe treatment of the body, but are of no value against fleshly indulgence.[19]

Our being in Christ is a blessing for which he paid a very high price. How comfortable and secure we feel in Christ has much to do with what we think of the Bible. As a rule book, it leaves me feeling inadequate. As a text book for Church teaching, it causes me frustration and doubt. As the story of God’s reconciliation, it provides assurance and confidence. I believe the Bible is a collection of individual books largely written by authors unassociated with each other over many centuries. The reconciliation of people with God is the primary focus of all scripture. I believe that everything Adam messed up, Jesus fixed up. I am sure there are some things in the Bible which have yet to happen, but reconciliation is not one of them. God kept his promises, God reconciled man to himself through Christ.

Abraham is the father of the faithful, we are his children. Jesus is our high priest and advocate. There is no condemnation to those who are in Christ. Sin barred man from God’s paradise, Christ opened the way for man to enter God’s paradise. Taking our place among the redeemed is not a personal achievement, but the gift of God’s grace. There is no need to memorialize Jesus’ death in a ritualistic ceremony, but to celebrate his sacrifice showing God’s love and grace in our lives.

The Lord’s supper was put in place for a specific reason and a specified time. There is nothing wrong in sharing a commemorative meal honouring Christ. It’s not an obligation, but it can be a very spiritual ceremony. I believe our predecessors have positioned us to question traditions and move to a more personal relationship with God. Fellowship is an essential component for growing in faith. Church services generally are not times of fellowship, but they could be. Kingdom life is taught in the parables and general teaching of Jesus. Learning to live and love like Jesus is a daily task that cannot be assigned to Church services or programs. Each day must be a day of worship, helping, caring for, and loving others. In many ways we have to deinstitutionalize our live so that we can be confident serving God in his kingdom.






[1] Mat 15:8, 9
[2] Mat 26:26-28
[3] Mar 14:22-25
[4] Luke 22:15-20
[5] Luke 24:30, 31
[6] Joh 13:34, 35
[7] 1Co 10:16 
[8] 1Co 11:19-34
[9] Joh 6:49-51
[10] Act 2:42-46
[11] Act 20:6, 7, 11
[12] Robert Reyburn
[13] Robert Grossman
[14] http://earlychurch.com
[15] Black's Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.
[16] Act 20:6, 7, 11
[17] Wiersbe Bible Commentary
[18] 1Co 11:30
[19] Col 2:16-23

Is What we Believe Tradition or God's Word?

  A sampling of comments and thoughts to think about when considering what we believe: A lie told often enough becomes the truth.” “In tod...