Whom do you want me to release for you, Jesus Barabbas or Jesus who is
called the Messiah?[1]
Not only was Barabbas's first name
Jesus, but his last name, Barabbas, means son (bar) of the father (abba).
Jesus had always referred to himself as the Son of the Father (and his
adversaries had always refused to acknowledge that he was). So now we had two
men named Jesus, each a "son of the father", but opposite fathers, it
would seem.[2]
The variant "Jesus
Barabbas" in Matthew 27:16-17 occurs in only a few Greek and Syriac
manuscripts. It is absent in the major 4th and 5th century uncials: Alef,
Alpha, Beta, Delta, etc.[3]
Then you are not the Egyptian who recently stirred up a revolt and led
the four thousand assassins out into
the wilderness?[4]
sik-ar'-ee-os
Of Latin origin; a dagger man or assassin; a freebooter
(Jewish fanatic outlawed by the Romans): - murderer.[5]
The irony of Barabbas having the same name as our Lord is
more probable, than the sentimentality of him not. Origen writing in the third
century CE thought it an
impropriety that an evil man such as Barabbas should have the name Jesus.
Barabbas was an enemy of the Empire, being that he was likely
a Jewish zealot or Sicarii. Not only did Barabbas have
the same name as the Lord, it’s also possible that Pilate recognized the
similarity of their causes. Both Barabbas and Jesus sought to liberate Israel.
Barabbas through violent political rebellion, and Jesus through sacrifice and
love. Pilate’s hint he would like Jesus to go free, was countered by the argument
that Jesus was a threat to Caesar and the Empire, because he claimed to be a
king. Pilate offered to release a prisoner, the people were to choose either
Jesus Barabbas or Jesus of Nazareth. To prevent moderate thinking people from
influencing the choice, the leaders along with their cohorts stirred the crowed
to call for Jesus Barabbas to be released and for Jesus the Messiah to be
crucified. The Jewish leadership got what they wanted, they would keep their
positions and status, but for how long?
The Sicarii might well be blamed for the Jewish rebellion of
66 CE. They were an early
version of terrorists. While they shared a similar cause to the Zealots, they
were more ruthless and undisciplined. The Sicarii killed Jews to prevent them from
fleeing Jerusalem during its siege. Zealots believed that God would protect the
temple and city they fought against Rome to gain independence. The Sicarii
killed indiscriminately. The modus
operandi of Barabbas appears more like that of the Sicarii than the
Zealots, but both were entirely antithetical to that of Jesus. While being
questioned by Pilate, Jesus asserted that his kingdom was different. Interestingly
the text answers the question –different to what?
My kingdom is not from this world. If my kingdom were from this world,
my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews.
But as it is, my kingdom is not from here.[6]
One might conjecture that Jesus refused any comparison to
Barabbas. Jesus’ cause was spiritual, and did not want anyone to think that his
cause was earthly, or had anything to do with the overthrow of Rome. The enemy
of Jesus was not Rome, it was the leadership of Israel. The chief priests and the elders, the
leaders of Israel feature in parables of Jesus as wicked overlords. They were
evil shepherds plundering the flock for their own appetites. The leaders needed
to fabricate reasons for putting Jesus to death. They lied. They portrayed
Jesus as a political agitator, as a disruptive force exciting rebellion. Jesus
was apolitical, completely immersed in his spiritual cause. That cause was “the
kingdom of heaven”. Pilate may have seen some similarity between Jesus’ cause
and Barabbas’ rebellion, but the Lord cleared that up. There was, and never
will be, a connection between earthly politics and the kingdom of God.
The crowd on that fateful day were manipulated by the chief
priests and elders to call for the release of Barabbas, and the crucifixion of
the Son of God. That was a bad choice, and yet it has been repeated many times
through the course of history. People when faced with a choice of earthly
benefit or spiritual responsibility, often go with what is at hand. There
exists a strong proclivity to opt for temporal benefits, for those things that
are immediate and material. At his arrest Jesus’ disciples were prepared to
fight to protect him;
Suddenly, one of those with Jesus put his hand on his sword, drew it,
and struck the slave of the high priest, cutting off his ear. Then Jesus said
to him, ‘Put your
sword back into its place; for all who take the sword will perish by the sword.
Do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and he will at once send me
more than twelve legions of angels? But how then would the scriptures be
fulfilled, which say it must happen in this way?’[7]
With physical resistance out of the question, the only
option for the disciples was to flee. Not until after the resurrection would
Jesus’ disciples begin to gather the import of spirituality. Every day we face
choices; I wonder if we consider the consequences of all the decisions we make.
Often times we default to habit not really considering the impact of our choices.
As we grow in Christ our choices will reflect our spirituality. And, hopefully
our causes will be more and more spiritual. The enemies of Christ will
endeavour to solicit choices which bolster their objectives. We need to look to
Jesus for strength and guidance to make spiritually based choices, when
confronted with options that could diminish our spirituality.
[1]
Mat 27:17
[2]
http://www.emergingtruths.com/jesus_and_barabbas/jesus_and_barabbas.html
[3]
http://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/ntstudies/yeshua-bar-abba.html
[4]
Act 21:38
[5]
Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries
[6]
Joh 18:36
[7]
Mat 26:51-54